Media this year was notified to deal with 8 senior officials, why did not mention illegal-truffe

Media: this year has been informed of 8 senior officials why did not mention the illegal data figure: Gai ruyin. This year, the Commission informed the results at least 8 provincial-level leading cadres, Legal Evening News reporter (public No.: guanhaineican WeChat Obama noted in reference), the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, especially in the title of "serious violations were expelled from the party and the public" is not "illegal" two words. For example, February 3rd bulletin, the title called "Heilongjiang Provincial People’s Congress Standing Committee of the former party secretary, deputy director of the cover, such as" serious violation of discipline "was expelled from the party and public office". 6 people were transferred to judicial organs. No title "illegal"   Legal Evening News reporter found that 8 people informed of the process results in this year, 6 people in addition to being "serious violations were expelled from the party and the public has been transferred to the judiciary, why have made it clear that the judicial organ is not informed of their illegal.? We first take a look at the bulletin case, in September 11, 2015 of last year, Huarun (Group) Co., the former party secretary and chairman Song Lin serious violation of law was expelled from the party; Hongkong China Travel Service (Group) former deputy party secretary, vice chairman and general manager Wang Shuaiting Huarun (Group) Co. Ltd. during the serious violation of law was expelled from the party. Song Lin and Wang Shuaiting were expelled from the party when the use of words are "serious violation of law"". In August 29, 2015, Wuhan Iron and Steel Group Chairman Deng Qilin was sacked, informed the Commission of the word is "suspected serious violation of law, in January 8th this year, Wuhan iron and steel (Group) company, the former party secretary, chairman Deng Qilin serious discipline was expelled from the party. When investigating, it is "violation of law and discipline", and only "discipline" is not illegal when dealing with the notification". In January 19th this year, the former Shanghai Municipal Committee, vice mayor Ai Baojun serious violation of discipline was expelled from the party and public office, and was transferred to judicial organs according to law. In fact, this is the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection will distinguish between discipline and illegal, which is reflected in the Commission for discipline inspection work focus, focus, re focus. Discipline can not replace law, discipline should be more strict than law. The Commission "case", is to supervise and discipline, and not the public security "catch the thief". Let discipline control discipline, the law of the tube to the law, which is the main task of returning to the main business. 2 people were notified because of discipline, no violation is still dealt with after eighteen big tiger early stage, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection cadres once expressed the judgment of violation of discipline. Legal Evening News reporter noted that, in the 8 of the provincial and ministerial cadres, two people have been punished by Party discipline and administrative dismissal. In February 4th, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection informed that the Minister of the former provincial Party committee and the Minister of organization of Hubei Province, He Jiatie, was removed from the party and dismissed from office due to serious violation of discipline. Another person notified on the same day, vice secretary of the former provincial Party committee of Sichuan province and governor Wei Wei revoked the party’s position and dismissed from office due to serious violation of discipline. These two people do not touch the law of their own violations, so there is no illegal behavior, they are not only subject to Party discipline, but also administrative sanctions. Jia iron from the deputy provincial cadres to the non lead 2 媒体:今年被通报处理8名高官为何没提违法 资料图:盖如垠。   今年以来,中纪委至少通报了8名省部级领导干部的处理结果,法制晚报记者(微信公众号:观海内参guanhaineican)注意到,在中纪委的处理结果里,特别是标题中“严重违纪被开除党籍和公职”已经没有了“违法”二字。   比如,2月3日的通报,标题就叫“黑龙江省人大常委会原党组书记、副主任盖如垠严重违纪被开除党籍和公职”。   6人被移送司法机关 通报标题中无“违法”    法制晚报记者发现,在今年通报处理结果的8人中,6人除了受到“严重违纪被开除党籍和公职”还被移交司法机关,为啥都已经明确表示移送司法机关还不通报他们违法呢?   我们先看看去年的通报案例,2015年9月11日,华润(集团)有限公司原党委书记、董事长宋林严重违纪违法被开除党籍;香港中旅(集团)有限公司原党委副书记、副董事长、总经理王帅廷在华润(集团)有限公司任职期间严重违纪违法被开除党籍。   宋林和王帅廷被开除党籍时的用词都是“严重违纪违法”。   2015年8月29日,武钢集团原董事长邓崎琳被通报“落马”,中纪委的用词是“涉嫌严重违纪违法”,今年1月8日,武汉钢铁(集团)公司原党委书记、董事长邓崎琳严重违纪被开除党籍。调查时为“违纪违法”,处理通报时只有“违纪”,没有“违法”。   今年1月19日,上海市原市委常委、副市长艾宝俊严重违纪被开除党籍和公职,并被移送司法机关依法处理。   实际上,这是中纪委将违纪和违法区分开来,这正体现着纪委工作聚焦聚焦再聚焦。纪律不能替代法律,纪律应该严于法律。纪委“办案”,是监督执纪,而不是党内公检法“抓小偷”。让管纪律的管好纪律,该法律管的交给法律,这是回归主业的本分。   2人因违纪被通报 没有违法仍被处理   十八大后抓大老虎前期,中纪委处理干部的表述一度成为违纪轻重的判断。   法制晚报记者注意到,在这8名被处理的省部级干部中,有两人受到了党纪处分和行政撤职处分。   2月4日,中纪委通报,湖北省原省委常委、组织部部长贺家铁因严重违纪受到撤销党内职务、行政撤职处分。同日通报的还有一人,四川省原省委副书记、省长魏宏因严重违纪受到撤销党内职务、行政撤职处分。   此二人本身的违纪行为并没有触碰法律,所以没有违法行为,他们除了受到党纪处分以外,还有行政处分。贺家铁从副省级干部降为正厅级非领导职务,魏宏从正省级干部被降为副厅级非领导职务。   去年以来,中纪委书记王歧山多次公开表态,坚持党纪严于国法,实现纪法分开。2015年10月12日,中共中央政治局召开会议审议通过了《中国共产党纪律处分条例》。该条例已于2016年1月1日起施行。   从以上两个案例可以看出,在没有触犯法律的情况下,触犯了党纪,那也要受到处理,这充分地体现了党纪严于国法。 责任编辑:张淳 SN182相关的主题文章: